The Hidden Risks of AI Toys: Navigating the Regulatory Gap

The Hidden Risks of AI Toys: Navigating the Regulatory Gap

Recent headlines have shaken the toy industry.

A popular AI-powered plush toy was recently pulled from shelves after it began engaging children in inappropriate, dangerous conversations.

For parents, this is a nightmare scenario: a device trusted to entertain a child suddenly becomes a threat. For manufacturers, it raises a critical question: Are these devices regulated?

The common perception is that "Generative AI" is a Wild West.

However, from a compliance perspective, the reality is different. While the specific rules for AI content generation are still maturing, the device itself; the hardware, the connection, and the data handling, is heavily regulated.

If you are manufacturing a connected, AI-enabled toy today, you are already subject to the Radio Equipment Directive (RED). Ignoring this framework is not just a safety risk, it is a compliance failure.

The Regulatory Reality: It’s a Radio Device

The confusion often stems from categorization. Is it a toy? Is it an AI model?

Legally, if it communicates wirelessly (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth), it is Radio Equipment.

As we detailed in Radio Equipment Directive in 2025: The 3 Key Pillars for a Successful Market Entry, the cybersecurity obligations of RED apply to all radio-enabled products placed on the EU market, regardless of their target audience.

This means a "smart" teddy bear must meet the same fundamental cybersecurity principles as an industrial sensor:

• Network Protection (Article 3.3d): The toy must not harm the network or function as a botnet entry point.
• Personal Data Privacy (Article 3.3e): This is critical for toys. Voice recordings and interaction logs are sensitive personal data. The device must protect this data during transmission and storage.
• Fraud Protection (Article 3.3f): The device must minimize the risk of unauthorized access or monetary fraud.

The recent incidents often highlight a failure in Article 3.3(e). If a toy collects voice data to process an AI response, that data pipeline must be secured against interception and misuse.

The "Immature" Regime: Where AI Meets Hardware

While the hardware connectivity is strictly regulated by RED, the "brain" of the toy; the Large Language Model (LLM) , sits in a more complex regulatory space.

This is where the "regulatory gap" exists, but it is closing fast.

Under the incoming EU AI Act, AI systems intended for use as safety components in products, or those covered by specific harmonization legislation (like toys), will face heightened scrutiny.

Article 43 of the AI Act will require rigorous conformity assessments for these high-risk systems. It will no longer be sufficient to rely on third-party APIs without testing how those APIs interact with the child.

Furthermore, the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) will mandate security across the entire lifecycle. As noted in Beyond 2025: Why RED is the Blueprint for CRA Success, manufacturers will be responsible for patching vulnerabilities for years after the sale.

A toy that "learns" and evolves via the cloud cannot be sold as a static product. It requires a dynamic security maintenance plan.

Educational Deep Dive: What Tests Are Typically Performed?

So, how do we guarantee safety in this environment?

Ensuring a smart toy is market-ready involves more than just physical safety tests (like checking for choking hazards). It requires a comprehensive Cybersecurity Evaluation.

At CCLab, we guide manufacturers through the specific tests required to close the gap between "cool tech" and "compliant product":

1. Gap Analysis: We map the toy's features (e.g., microphone, Wi-Fi, cloud connection) against the requirements of EN 18031 and the upcoming AI Act.
2. Vulnerability Assessment: We scan the device for known weaknesses. Can the firmware be extracted? Are the API keys hardcoded?
3. Penetration Testing: Our ethical hackers attempt to breach the device. Can we hijack the speaker? Can we access the camera remotely?
4. Protocol Testing: We verify that the communication between the toy and the cloud is encrypted and authenticated, ensuring no "man-in-the-middle" can inject malicious audio.

Summary

The lesson from recent toy recalls is clear: Connectivity brings complexity.

Innovation in the toy sector is moving fast, but the foundational regulations, RED and CRA, are already in place to protect consumers.

Manufacturers who view these smart toys as "unregulated" tech demos risk rigorous enforcement action and reputational damage.

By leveraging RED cybersecurity assessments as a baseline, you serve two purposes: you meet your legal obligations under EU law, and more importantly, you ensure that the technology remains a tool for learning, not a source of harm.

Secure your connected products today.

‍